In the Urban Renewal Act, the Article 36 shows us a special phrase, "forced removal"（強制拆除）, and every country has the same phrase in its Urban Renewal Act. Firstly, the opposition should REALLY understand why the whole world uses the same phrase, and therefore they can continue to propose their opinions to the government. If the government always compromises with few people, the government can dissolve all of the urban renewal organizations, including the Department of Urban Planning at NCKU.
Wang's house isn't a communication problem, but the planning of urban renewal must be a general design and planning. Or, the modern and traditional buildings won't be uniform. Nobody likes such kind of city, so that the government has to schedule the forced removal. If Wang can get the reasonable conditions（house or money）, they may be possible to buy a new house in the other place. It's not necessary to live in the same place, and Wang can move to the other place. All of the opposition shall think about what the public interest is, and they will comprehend the spirit of Urban Renewal Act.
The leading role was accused of Offense Against Reputation by the builder, and more than one thousand people supported her. In fact, she violated the Criminal Code truly, but she's still possible to pronounced innocent according to the Article 311 III which is the fair comment on a fact subject to public criticism. Besides, I want to point out the issue that the objective of Urban Renewal Act is old houses but new houses. If Wang's house is built in the Japanese Age, the government shall possibly retain it as a memorial building. There are many old streets in Taiwan, and the government always plans them as the tourist spots, 安平老街, 三峽老街, 內灣老街…,for examples. What's the public interest?
References
Wang's house isn't a communication problem, but the planning of urban renewal must be a general design and planning. Or, the modern and traditional buildings won't be uniform. Nobody likes such kind of city, so that the government has to schedule the forced removal. If Wang can get the reasonable conditions（house or money）, they may be possible to buy a new house in the other place. It's not necessary to live in the same place, and Wang can move to the other place. All of the opposition shall think about what the public interest is, and they will comprehend the spirit of Urban Renewal Act.
The leading role was accused of Offense Against Reputation by the builder, and more than one thousand people supported her. In fact, she violated the Criminal Code truly, but she's still possible to pronounced innocent according to the Article 311 III which is the fair comment on a fact subject to public criticism. Besides, I want to point out the issue that the objective of Urban Renewal Act is old houses but new houses. If Wang's house is built in the Japanese Age, the government shall possibly retain it as a memorial building. There are many old streets in Taiwan, and the government always plans them as the tourist spots, 安平老街, 三峽老街, 內灣老街…,for examples. What's the public interest?
References
- 李雲深（2012.04.08）聲援王家被告 臉書發起千人自首團，新頭殼newtalk，http://newtalk.tw/news_read.php?oid=23981
- 舒子榕（2012.04.06）陳揆：都更案 內政部應注意立法目的，聯合晚報，http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS3/7010166.shtml
