I watch the Formosa TV tonight, and I know the problem of the Nuclear Power IV is the mechanical and electrical system too complex. I think the standard operating procedure is necessary for the nuclear engineers. It’s so hard to control, so that the most professional people cannot promise its security. Of course, I have understood this problem, and I have a question to ask everybody. Can you accept Taipower raises the power rate again and again if Taipower changes its power strategy? Hydroelectricity, Wind Power, … etc, for examples. After the Republic 107, the Nuclear Power I will stop operating, and therefore the north Taiwan will be possible short of electricity.
Google搜尋引擎
上次更新:2020年12月20日
|
上次更新:2022年04月16日
|
上次更新:2023年09月10日
|
The Ching-Min Huang Office in Civil Engineering which is a technical store provides the Owner's technologies and its related products in Taiwan Empire. |
|
2012年4月14日 星期六
2012年4月9日 星期一
Urban Renewal and Wang's House III
In the Urban Renewal Act, the Article 36 shows us a special phrase, "forced removal"(強制拆除), and every country has the same phrase in its Urban Renewal Act. Firstly, the opposition should REALLY understand why the whole world uses the same phrase, and therefore they can continue to propose their opinions to the government. If the government always compromises with few people, the government can dissolve all of the urban renewal organizations, including the Department of Urban Planning at NCKU.
Wang's house isn't a communication problem, but the planning of urban renewal must be a general design and planning. Or, the modern and traditional buildings won't be uniform. Nobody likes such kind of city, so that the government has to schedule the forced removal. If Wang can get the reasonable conditions(house or money), they may be possible to buy a new house in the other place. It's not necessary to live in the same place, and Wang can move to the other place. All of the opposition shall think about what the public interest is, and they will comprehend the spirit of Urban Renewal Act.
The leading role was accused of Offense Against Reputation by the builder, and more than one thousand people supported her. In fact, she violated the Criminal Code truly, but she's still possible to pronounced innocent according to the Article 311 III which is the fair comment on a fact subject to public criticism. Besides, I want to point out the issue that the objective of Urban Renewal Act is old houses but new houses. If Wang's house is built in the Japanese Age, the government shall possibly retain it as a memorial building. There are many old streets in Taiwan, and the government always plans them as the tourist spots, 安平老街, 三峽老街, 內灣老街…,for examples. What's the public interest?
References
Wang's house isn't a communication problem, but the planning of urban renewal must be a general design and planning. Or, the modern and traditional buildings won't be uniform. Nobody likes such kind of city, so that the government has to schedule the forced removal. If Wang can get the reasonable conditions(house or money), they may be possible to buy a new house in the other place. It's not necessary to live in the same place, and Wang can move to the other place. All of the opposition shall think about what the public interest is, and they will comprehend the spirit of Urban Renewal Act.
The leading role was accused of Offense Against Reputation by the builder, and more than one thousand people supported her. In fact, she violated the Criminal Code truly, but she's still possible to pronounced innocent according to the Article 311 III which is the fair comment on a fact subject to public criticism. Besides, I want to point out the issue that the objective of Urban Renewal Act is old houses but new houses. If Wang's house is built in the Japanese Age, the government shall possibly retain it as a memorial building. There are many old streets in Taiwan, and the government always plans them as the tourist spots, 安平老街, 三峽老街, 內灣老街…,for examples. What's the public interest?
References
- 李雲深(2012.04.08)聲援王家被告 臉書發起千人自首團,新頭殼newtalk,http://newtalk.tw/news_read.php?oid=23981
- 舒子榕(2012.04.06)陳揆:都更案 內政部應注意立法目的,聯合晚報,http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS3/7010166.shtml
訂閱:
文章 (Atom)